The use of research to inform and improve school education should,
in my opinion, be widely appealing. However, I am often struck by the debate
within education regarding the value of research to inform educational policy
and practice. This debate
perhaps reflects the obstacles and challenges in place which prevent research
from being used optimally. In
this post, I will consider some of main challenges that I believe exist at
present:
Existing structures do not support communication and collaboration
between researchers and teachers
There are, at present, poor structures to initiate and support
communication between researchers and those with responsibility and power to
change educational practice and policy (e.g., teachers, policy makers). Indeed, systems or structures aimed at
accruing research evidence on topics of importance to teachers and policy
makers are lacking. Most
applications for educational research grant funding originate from researchers,
often with little or no communication with teachers or policy makers from the
outset. Therefore there is
very little truly collaborative research work among
researchers, teachers and policy makers.
Access to existing research is poor and difficult to navigate
There is an overwhelming volume of research that exists already;
improving teacher’s access to it and providing them with time and support to
identify high quality research directly relevant to their needs is necessary. Lack of time is an issue consistently
cited by teachers, who may be keen to use evidence to inform their practices,
but lack the time to spend navigating and studying the literature. In addition, being able to identify
relevant research, recognise differences between good and poor quality research and understand the
limitations of even the highest quality research is both time consuming and
demanding. Databases developed specifically for teachers to access relevant
research quickly and easily are developing (e.g., see http://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/toolkit) and syntheses of research across
a wide range of relevant topics provide a single resource for teachers to turn
to (see http://visible-learning.org/).
However,
single researchers need to consider additional ways to communicate good quality
research to those working in education. Academic research papers published in journals are not
typically freely available, and are often written for those working within
academia; therefore are not immediately useful and accessible for busy
teachers. Researchers
should consider a broader audience when writing for academic journals
(particularly with an increase in open access), but also start considering
alternative routes to share research.
Research perceived to lack relevance
The gap between researchers interests and teachers/policy makers’
needs or priority areas, could also be responsible for the low status often
assigned to research. It is
difficult for teachers and policy makers to be enthusiastic about research, if
research conducted is not considered to be directly relevant to their
needs. Researchers need to
increasingly involve teachers/policy makers in their research from the outset,
at the point at which they are developing their research questions, to ensure
they are relevant and important.
“What constitutes the
relevance of research, for instance, depends to a large extent on what
questions are being asked, in what context, and for what practical ends” Philip Davis (1999).
Research perceived to undermine teacher’s professional judgement
It is considered, by some, that evidence-based education (i.e.,
the use of research evidence to inform education), removes teacher autonomy and
professional judgement. However,
teachers with greater knowledge and understanding of research evidence in a
specific area should be more able, and confident, to exercise good professional
judgement. Communicating
research well allows teachers to make reasoned and informed decisions about
their practices and how best to support children’s learning.
“The opportunity to make informed decisions
about what works best, using good quality evidence, represents a truer form of
professional independence” Ben Goldacre
(2013)
It should not be a prescriptive approach to education that is
being promoted, but instead, the use of evidence to allow teachers to make
effective decisions about what is likely to work best for their students.
References
Davis,
P. (1999). What is evidence based
education? British Journal of Educational Studies, 47, 108-121
Goldacre,
B. (2013). Building Evidence into Education. For full
report see: http://media.education.gov.uk/assets/files/pdf/b/ben%20goldacre%20paper.pdf
Hattie,
J. (2009). Visible Learning. A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses
relating to achievement. Routledge. For resources, see: http://visible-learning.org/
Education
Endowment Foundation Toolkit. For
toolkit see: http://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/toolkit
No comments:
Post a Comment