Wednesday, 24 September 2014

Speaking up for children's reading motivation!


I’m a reading researcher and my research interests initially concerned different methods of reading instruction and the implications of these methods of instruction for children’s reading attainment and word recognition processes.  Therefore my interests in reading were primarily within the cognitive domain, rather than focused on the role of children’s attitudes and motivation towards reading (often referred to as the affective domain).

However, as a researcher conducting reading assessments among children of different ages and in different schools, it started to become clear that children’s reading attitudes and motivation could have a significant influence on their reading attainment (over and above their cognitive abilities).  This led me to carry out a series of research studies (see here for access to published academic papers: https://edinburgh.academia.edu/SarahMcGeown) exploring children’s motivation to read in the UK. 

Indeed, there is now mounting research evidence that both cognitive (e.g., language, decoding skills) and affective (e.g., reading motivation, attitudes) factors independently predict variance in children’s reading skills and reading development; therefore both the ‘skill’ and ‘will’ are important.  Furthermore, it is suggested that children’s reading motivation, attitudes etc have both direct and indirect influences on their reading skill and development. Direct, as children with higher levels of reading motivation are more cognitively engaged when reading and are more likely to implement strategies which lead to deeper processing of the text (e.g., spend more time deciphering unfamiliar words, look back to ensure they are accurately comprehending the story).  These strategies used by more motivated children are considered advantageous to their reading skill over time.  In addition, there is also an indirect relationship between children’s reading motivation and their reading skill: children who are more motivated to read typically read more frequently (and may be more likely to select challenging texts to read); these reading activities then benefit their reading skill. 

However, the relationship between reading motivation and reading skill is also reciprocal as children’s reading skills also influence their motivation to read (i.e., children with better reading skills report greater motivation to read). This highlights how difficult it is to disentangle cognitive and affective influences on reading skill and development.  Despite this, there are very few researchers studying both; I’d consider myself among a handful of researchers doing so.  This is particularly noticeable within the UK, where the majority of psychologists examining different aspects of children’s reading (e.g., different methods of reading instruction, word recognition processes, comprehension skills, reading difficulties etc) focus almost exclusively on aspects of cognition.

So I’d like to speak up for reading motivation and the affective aspects of reading, particularly in the UK, where it is given relatively little attention and focus among researchers.  We need to understand more about the multi-dimensional nature of children’s reading motivation (i.e., the various reasons why children read), the changing nature of children’s reading motivation (i.e., as digital texts are being more widely used) and whether reading programmes or interventions with a greater focus on developing these affective aspects of reading (reading for pleasure, to learn, to share stories with friends) are as effective (or more effective) than cognitive focused programmes/interventions, when it comes to developing children’s reading skills.

I have recently written a minibook on this topic as I am interested in sharing this research area with teachers: (http://www.ukla.org/publications/view/reading_motivation_and_engagement_in_the_primary_school_classroom/). The minibook draws upon a strong research literature (approximately 60 peer reviewed research papers) but shares this information is an accessible and easy manner, providing an introduction to reading motivation theory, research and implications for education.   

 

Reference:

McGeown, S. (2013).  Reading motivation and engagement in the primary school classroom: Theory, research and practice.  United Kingdom Literacy Association.  http://www.ukla.org/publications/view/reading_motivation_and_engagement_in_the_primary_school_classroom/

Tuesday, 9 September 2014

Mental toughness and education


Mental toughness refers to a set of positive psychological characteristics that have almost exclusively been studied within sport; however their potential to understand non-cognitive attributes which may be important within education are now being considered.  I wrote a short article on this for Character Scotland earlier in the year (see here: http://www.character-scotland.org.uk/featured-articles/item/383-what-does-it-mean-to-be-mentally-tough#.U8PMNZ1waUk), which describes the concept of mental toughness and its underpinning attributes (confidence, challenge, control and commitment), which I will briefly describe again here:

Commitment refers to setting goals or targets and working hard to achieve them.  Challenge refers to seeing new activities or situations as opportunities for self-development, rather than as threats. Control is divided into life control and emotional control; life control refers to feeling that we have the power to shape our own life and future, while emotion control refers to being able to manage emotions (e.g., anxiety, anger) to an appropriate level of intensity. Confidence is divided into confidence in abilities and interpersonal confidence; confidence in abilities refers to being confident to attempt new or difficult tasks, whereas interpersonal confidence refers to levels of confidence within social situations.


Children and adolescents will vary in the extent to which they report high levels of mental toughness and their reported levels are likely to vary across each of the attributes (e.g., a student may report high levels of commitment, but low levels of interpersonal confidence).  Recent research has found a relationship between these mental toughness characteristics and adolescents’ school attendance, attainment, classroom behaviour and peer relationships (see here: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/01443410.2014.895294)

I have recently written a review paper on this topic (along with collaborators) which considers the extent to which the mental toughness may be a useful framework to study non-cognitive attributes within education (see earlier blog for discussion of non-cognitive attributes: http://www.drsarahmcgeown.blogspot.co.uk/2014/08/non-cognitive-attributes-and_1.html).  Within this review paper, we discuss the extent to which mental toughness attributes overlap with a number of non-cognitive attributes already demonstrated as important within education (e.g., resilience, motivation, self-control, confidence).  Among students, we discuss the role of these positive psychological traits across a range of educational contexts (e.g., managing exam stress/anxiety, developing positive peer relationships, influences on academic attainment etc).  However, we also consider the value in studying and developing mental toughness among teachers.  As a high number of teachers leave the teaching profession early in their career, often citing stress as the cause, developing mental toughness type attributes may increase retention, but perhaps more importantly, enhance teacher well-being, effectiveness and professional satisfaction.


References:

McGeown, S. P. (2013).What does it mean to be mentally tough?  Character Scotland: http://www.character-scotland.org.uk/featured-articles/item/383-what-does-it-mean-to-be-mentally-tough#.U8PMNZ1waUk

St Clair-Thompson, H., Bugler, M., Robinson, J., Clough, P., McGeown, S. P., & Perry, J.  (2014).  Mental toughness in education: exploring relationships with attainment, attendance, behaviour and peer relationships.  Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology. DOI: 10.1080/01443410.2014.895294